Ashley Fox has spoken in Westminster to oppose ‘disaster’ salt marsh in the Bridgwater constituency.
The proposed salt marshes on the Severn estuary are seen as mitigation measures by EDF to offset its environmental impact at Hinkley Point C.
Ashley Fox, MP for Bridgwater, secured and led the Westminster Hall debate in Parliament on October 9 to scrutinise EDF’s recently withdrawn proposal for an 800-acre salt marsh at Pawlett Hams.
Addressing the Minister for Nature, Mary Creagh CBE, Ashley Fox said: “Pawlett Hams is a precious ecosystem. EDF’s plans to flood the area with saltwater would endanger not just the land itself, but the myriad species that call it home.”
He continued: “EDF’s plan was a disaster, and even if it went ahead, it was not clear how it would mitigate the problem of the fish that would be lost.”
Fox credited Pawlett Hams Action Group for their persistence in securing a U-turn from EDF over the proposed salt marsh. He added: “It seems to me that EDF and the Environment Agency are putting together a package of mitigation measures in the hope that the deal will be signed off.”
The deal Fox references is the controversial use of an acoustic fish deterrent in the Severn Estuary, which emits a loud noise underwater to stop fish approaching intake pipes to the nuclear power station. The MP claims that, since EDF have also U-turned on deploying this technology, compensatory habitat measures – such as salt marshes – now form part of the mitigation measures.
The Minister for Nature responded, stating that “salt marshes have had a bad rap in this debate”, and the examples in Somerset are the subject of a live planning case. A decision will be made by the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, Ed Miliband. The Minister added: “I am confident that he will do so correctly, in line with the requirements of the Planning Act.”
